Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 April 2010

• 00:18   Re: Gsoc XQuery Joseph Adams
• 00:28   Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue Joseph Adams
• 03:53   Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Greg Smith
• 04:32   Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Robert Haas
• 05:23   Re: testing hot standby Jaime Casanova
• 06:26   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Yeb Havinga
• 07:07   Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:20   Re: Set LC_COLLATE to de_DE_phoneb Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:27   pg_ctl stop -m immediate on the primary server inflates sequences Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 07:31   Re: pg_ctl stop -m immediate on the primary server inflates sequences Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 11:05   Re: pg_ctl stop -m immediate on the primary server inflates sequences Bernd Helmle
• 12:18   Re: a faster compression algorithm for pg_dump Joachim Wieland
• 12:37   Re: pg_ctl stop -m immediate on the primary server inflates sequences Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 13:02   Re: master in standby mode croaks Robert Haas
• 13:15   Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Andrew Dunstan
• 13:18   Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Robert Haas
• 14:16   Virtual Private Database Jean-Gérard Pailloncy
• 16:05   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Yeb Havinga
• 16:23   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Robert Haas
• 17:13   Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Kevin Grittner
• 18:25   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Yeb Havinga
• 18:30   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Jeff Davis
• 19:02   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Robert Haas
• 19:04   Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces Robert Haas
• 20:02   Re: pg_ctl stop -m immediate on the primary server inflates sequences Martijn van Oosterhout