Mailing lists [pgsql-bugs]

21 December 2017

• 04:45   Re: vacuum vs heap_update_tuple() and multixactids Robert Haas
• 04:45   Re: vacuum vs heap_update_tuple() and multixactids Robert Haas
• 12:16   Order of columns in GROUP BY is significant to the planner. Jeff Janes
• 16:13   Re: Order of columns in GROUP BY is significant to the planner. David Rowley
• 20:02   BUG #14988: application server couldnot contacted PG Bug reporting form
• 20:05   Re: BUG #14986: -2147483648 is minimum value of integer but-2147483648::integer fails (out of range). Greg Stark
• 20:13   Re: BUG #14986: -2147483648 is minimum value of integer but-2147483648::integer fails (out of range). Andres Freund
• 20:27   Re: BUG #14986: -2147483648 is minimum value of integer but-2147483648::integer fails (out of range). Alvaro Herrera
• 20:28   Re: vacuum vs heap_update_tuple() and multixactids Amit Kapila
• 20:28   Re: vacuum vs heap_update_tuple() and multixactids Amit Kapila
• 20:37   Re: Order of columns in GROUP BY is significant to the planner. Tom Lane
• 21:06   BUG #14989: Postgis 2.4.2 for PostgreSQL 10 fails to install PG Bug reporting form
• 22:58   BUG #14990: hashint4() <> hashint8() for small negative values,causing hash joins to fail PG Bug reporting form
• 23:31   Re: BUG #14990: hashint4() <> hashint8() for small negative values, causing hash joins to fail Tom Lane
• 23:40   psql cannot read client SSL private key from a pipe Tony Finch
• 23:43   Re: BUG #14990: hashint4() <> hashint8() for small negative values,causing hash joins to fail Todd A. Cook
• 23:53   Re: BUG #14990: hashint4() <> hashint8() for small negative values,causing hash joins to fail Todd A. Cook