Mailing lists [pgsql-bugs]

1 December 2011

• 00:10   Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs Tom Lane
• 01:11   9.1.1 hot standby startup gets sigbus Josh Kupershmidt
• 01:17   Re: 9.1.1 hot standby startup gets sigbus Tom Lane
• 02:37   Re: 9.1.1 hot standby startup gets sigbus Josh Kupershmidt
• 02:50   Re: 9.1.1 hot standby startup gets sigbus Tom Lane
• 06:21   Re: possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs Jeff Davis
• 13:07   Re: 9.1.1 hot standby startup gets sigbus Josh Kupershmidt
• 13:18   Re: BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work [sec=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Momjian
• 13:39   BUG #6312: Test bug magnus@hagander.net
• 15:01   BUG #6313: Deadlock reporting contains not enought details dmigowski@ikoffice.de
• 15:40   Postgre Cross compilation for coldfire processor. Suneel Kumar M
• 15:54   Re: BUG #6313: Deadlock reporting contains not enought details Tom Lane
• 16:40   BUG #6314: The like command does not handle a long string of special chars d.rericha@healthcareoss.com
• 16:54   Re: 9.1.1 hot standby startup gets sigbus Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: BUG #6314: The like command does not handle a long string of special chars Kevin Grittner
• 17:08   Re: BUG #6314: The like command does not handle a long string of special chars Tom Lane
• 19:05   BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails rep.dot.nop@gmail.com
• 19:11   Re: Postgre Cross compilation for coldfire processor. Robert Haas
• 19:41   Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 20:33   Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails Tom Lane
• 20:51   Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails Alvaro Herrera
• 21:06   Re: BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails Tom Lane