Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Date
Msg-id zdlyd6k6tto55tgn26wp5oeytmeipihn2ika4olm43kdgpxkhr@lsfb4zgo4oxq
Whole thread
In response to Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2026-04-19 13:53:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The text I put in the wiki, which I have followed for years, says:
>
>     https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Creating_Major_Release_Notes
>     Performance improvements are mentioned in the release notes if
>     they are user-visible (e.g., new syntax) or significant enough
>     to enable new workloads.
>
> I didn't think +12-17% for an index build would enable new workloads.
> If you want to relitigate that, you are welcome to do so.  If this is
> changed, it has to be done so consistently, not just for this item.

Just about everyone has disagreed vehemently with you about this, in every of
the last 5 releases or so.  I don't think it's ok that you continue to ignore
that.

I find this policy so depressing that I stopped even opening the release
notes, just to preserve whatever semblance of sanity I possess.  I'm know I'm
not alone in that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Next
From: Paul A Jungwirth
Date:
Subject: Re: DELETE/UPDATE FOR PORTION OF with rule system is not working