Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
Date
Msg-id z4aloin5laepwqhmg6h3jlnatta5cntsvlvzqpajpejfpnyz7v@ufltmwo4y5ml
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-10-15 19:39:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> > I have spotted a couple of buildfarm failures for buildfarm member
> > phycodorus on REL_14_STABLE and REL_13_STABLE:
> > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-10-15%2009%3A12%3A36
> 
> phycodorus seems to be running a remarkably ancient LLVM version.

It intentionally tests the oldest supported version... If we don't care, I'm
happy enough to just remove the animal.


> I wonder if we should just write these off as "probably an LLVM bug".

I'm not sure that's really convincing, given that REL_16_STABLE seems to not
have an issue?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature: psql - display current search_path in prompt