Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Date
Msg-id ytjxycbqtqcdw6o57ljfmerzcudhxcymlmqspoqubjgxep5t4g@nzilrsos3e3v
Whole thread
In response to Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded  (Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2026-04-07 21:05:40 +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> I’ve posted two patches. The first fixes the duplication issue
> reported by Andres and is fairly straightforward. The second turned
> out to be more complex than expected, and I’m still working through
> possible solutions. Feedback or alternative approaches would be very
> helpful.
> I also spent some time drafting a patch to address the memory ordering
> issue and will post it later.

I propose quickly applying a minimal patch like the attached, to get the test
performance back to normal.

Will do so unless somebody protests within in one CI cycle and one coffee.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: meson: Make test output much more useful on failure (both in CI and locally)
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_buffercache: Add per-relation summary stats