Stephen Frost writes:
>
> It’s generally better as it follows the SQL standard and is more flexible
> as it allows you to get top-N, as I said. DISTINCT ON has always been a
> hack and its use should be discouraged at this point.
>
> When an UPSERT capability exists in the actual standard then it’s use
> should be promoted over other hacks that various vendors have implemented
> also.
OK, thanks, I've filed this discussion away for future reference.
Meanwhile I'm having trouble getting this function to work as a
trigger. I'll start another thread on that.
Thanks again.
Roger
