Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Subject Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Date
Msg-id xuyoft2xzvc.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (Martín Marqués <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> > 
> > When compared to the earlier ones (including XFS), you'll note that ReiserFS
> > performance is rather poor in some of the tests  - it takes 37 vs. 13
> > seconds for 8192 inserts, when the inserts are different transactions.
> 
> That is all the fsync delay, probably, and it should be using fdatasync()
> on that kernel.

And it does seem to work that way with XFS...

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: I still cannot force pg_dump to disable triggers