Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Subject Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Date
Msg-id xuy8zgo93f4.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right?
> 
> Yes.  I believe I know which patch he's referring to --- it's the only
> change in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c since 7.1.  If he hasn't committed
> in a few hours I can take care of back-patching it.  It must be pushing
> midnight in Japan by now...

That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening?

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rene Pijlman
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: RE: PL/pgSQL bug?