Re: Buglist - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: Buglist
Date
Msg-id x7wud73b7g.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Buglist  (Bo Lorentsen <bl@netgroup.dk>)
Responses Re: Buglist  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

TL> Just nice'ing the VACUUM process is likely to be counterproductive
TL> because of locking issues (priority inversion).  Though if anyone cares
TL> to try it on a heavily-loaded system, I'd be interested to hear the
TL> results...

tried it once.  didn't make much difference except that vacuum took
longer than normal.  i didn't see any deadlocks.

i actually figured out what my main problem was.  vacuum every 6 hours
on my two busiest tables was taking longer than 6 hours when we were
very busy...

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: darren@crystalballinc.com
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/tcl trigger question
Next
From: Jonathan Bartlett
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases?