On 2025-04-04 19:07:12 +0200, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> They actually look good to me. We've discussed earlier dropping
> s/numa_//g for column names (after all views contain it already) so
> they are fine in this regard.
> There's also the question of consistency: (bufferid, page_num,
> node_id) -- maybe should just drop "_" and that's it?
> Well I would even possibly consider page_num -> ospagenumber, but that's ugly.
I'd go for os_page_num.
