Re: Visibility regression test - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Manfred Koizar
Subject Re: Visibility regression test
Date
Msg-id v6dsmu4p0spiue3ar92rt3t922vbvr2dal@4ax.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Visibility regression test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Visibility regression test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:30:59 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
>Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes:
>> A new regression test trying to detect runaway INSERTs/UPDATEs.
>
>Why?

Because we do not want to run a database that gets hung in an endless
loop on INSERT or UPDATE.  Better we find such bugs during regression
testing.

>Seems like a waste of test cycles to me.

I'd agree, if the test was not able to detect the error condition it
was written for.  But I did a test with a buggy postmaster and the bug
was detected.

Servus
 Manfred

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT