Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karsten Hilbert
Subject Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date
Msg-id trinity-e0d701f3-ee75-4a79-ad2a-f5f0423720ea-1384954567985@3capp-gmx-bs05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
List pgsql-general
> Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > Let me try to rephrase:
> >
> > Fact: pg_upgrade can NOT properly upgrade clusters which contain
> >       databases that are set to "default_transaction_read_only on"
> >
> > Question: Is this intended ?
>
> I am pretty sure that this is an oversight and hence a bug.

oversight, yes ... I thought as much and was therefore a bit
cautious of calling it a bug, chose to name it "?deficiency" ;-)

Karsten


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Next
From: Paul Jones
Date:
Subject: Debugging extension with gdb?