Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rakesh Kumar
Subject Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing
Date
Msg-id trinity-db855e95-2631-4912-899f-df3ef2320c66-1515455658940@3c-app-mailcom-lxa06
Whole thread Raw
In response to How Many Partitions are Good Performing  ("Kumar, Virendra" <Virendra.Kumar@guycarp.com>)
Responses Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing  (Andrew Staller <andrew@timescale.com>)
List pgsql-general
 You should have read carefully what I wrote.  1000 is not an upper limit.  1000 partition is the number after which
performancestarts dropping .   

There is a blog in www.timescale.com which also highlights the same.

Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 at 6:20 PM
From: "Kumar, Virendra" <Virendra.Kumar@guycarp.com>
To: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: How Many Partitions are Good Performing

Can somebody tell us how many partitions are good number without impacting the performance. We are hearing around a
thousand,is that a limit. Do we have plan to increase the number of partitions for a table. We would appreciate if
somebodycan help us with this? 
 
Regards,
Virendra
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message
and its attachments and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Kumar, Virendra"
Date:
Subject: How Many Partitions are Good Performing
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: How Many Partitions are Good Performing