Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream
Date
Msg-id tjhnl6hiooo4aj6tktyehf4pn4yxcaqndlqebgpmynw4tmticq@odfcssnjf2qu
Whole thread
In response to Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

Attached is an updated set of patches.  I fixed the bug that Melanie noticed,
updated the comments a bit further and added a new commit that adds a decent
bit of coverage of StartReadBuffers(), including all the cases in
StartSharedBufferIO and most of the cases in StartLocalBufferIO().

I'm planning to commit 0001 soon - it hasn't changed in a while. Then I'd like
to get 0002 committed soon after, but I'll hold off for that until tomorrow,
given that nobody has looked at it (as it's new).  I think 0004-0007 can be
committed too, but I am not sure if you (Melanie) want to do so.

I'd like to get the rest committed tomorrow too.

Greetings,

Andres Freund
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: meson vs. llvm bitcode files
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread