Some time ago I had to setup a replicated file system between multiple linux servers. I tried everything I could based on postgres, including large objects, but everything was significantly slower than a regular filesystem.
My conclussion: postgres is not suitable for storing large files efficiently.
Do you need that for replication, or just for file storage?
Alvaro Aguayo
Jefe de Operaciones
Open Comb Systems E.I.R.L.
Oficina: (+51-1) 3377813 | RPM: #034252 / (+51) 995540103 | RPC: (+51) 954183248
Website: www.ocs.pe
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
---- Sridhar N Bamandlapally wrote ----
all media files are stored in database with size varies from 1MB - 5GB
based on media file types and user-group we storing in different tables, but PostgreSQL store OID/Large-object in single table (pg_largeobject), 90% of database size is with table pg_largeobject
due to size limitation BYTEA was not considered
Thanks
Sridhar