Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Sorry, but that one got right pass me. 'playing favorites'?
>
>
> your comment about 'limiting the number of overlaps' ... to do that,
> the one maintaining this package would have to decide that 'PL/J' is
> better then 'PL/Java' (or vice versa) ... if maintainer doesn't
> know/use Java, then, what, each group of developer then 'lobbies' the
> maintainer for inclusion?
If they where considered overlapping solutions there would have to be a
vote, but, as I explained earlier in this thread, that's not necessarily
the case
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
