Tom Lane wrote:
> Looking at the code, it appears that the java call handler *has* been
> called once,
indeed. Obviously I didn't pay too much attention to the trace.
> and what it returned was a tuple that didn't carry any
> type identification. This is probably because you didn't call
> BlessTupleDesc. nodeFunctionscan.c formerly did that, and I suppose
> it should keep doing it for backwards compatibility. I put back the
> call...
>
I hope that doesn't have a negative performance impact in general. If
so, I'd be happy to add the missing BlessTupleDesc at my end instead.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
