Hi, thanks for the test!
> One question:
> The original code did not apply MAXALIGN() to SizeOfXLogRecord before
> adding it. In practice SizeOfXLogRecord is likely already MAXALIGN'd
> (given typical record header layout), but could you confirm whether
> MAXALIGN() here is a correctness fix, a defensive no-op, or something
> that requires a separate note in the commit message?
>
> Otherwise the change looks good to me, and I think it's a reasonable
> cleanup.
I apply the MAXALIGN() to keep it consistent with ReserveXLogSwitch(), the
value seems unchanged though.
Attach v2 which is more efficient.
--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen
