> Here is a version 4 of the patch which uses the fact that we have method
> tables to remove one level of indirection. I am not sure the extra lines
> of codes are worth it but on the other hand despite 40 more lines the
> code became easier to read to me. What do you think?
I don't have any major objections, but I noticed a few minor details that might need a bit more tweaking.
`signficant` -> `significant`
`realtively` -> `relatively`
`if (status != U_BUFFER_OVERFLOW_ERROR && U_FAILURE(status))` -> `if (U_FAILURE(status) && status !=
U_BUFFER_OVERFLOW_ERROR)`
--
Regards,
Man Zeng
www.openhalo.org
