Re: Deduplication and transaction isolation level - Mailing list pgsql-general

From DDT
Subject Re: Deduplication and transaction isolation level
Date
Msg-id tencent_37CF816560235B4D6E9F02CE@qq.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Deduplication and transaction isolation level  (Steven Schlansker <steven@likeness.com>)
List pgsql-general
Is your table have only pkey one field and the sql is the exact same sql you use?

If you have more than one field to insert, DISTINCT ensure the whole row values set are distinct instead of one field value. that't maybe a reason for your situation.


------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Steven Schlansker";<steven@likeness.com>;
Date:  Thu, Sep 26, 2013 01:50 AM
To:  "Merlin Moncure"<mmoncure@gmail.com>;
Cc:  "François Beausolei"<francois@teksol.info>; "Forums postgresql"<pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
Subject:  Re: [GENERAL] Deduplication and transaction isolation level


On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, François Beausoleil
> <francois@teksol.info> wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I import many, many rows of data into a table, from three or more computers, 4 times per hour. I have a primary key, and the query I use to import the data is supposed to dedup before inserting, but I still get primary key violations.
>>
>> The import process is:
>>
>> * Load CSV data into temp table
>> * INSERT INTO dest SELECT DISTINCT (pkey) FROM temp WHERE NOT EXISTS(temp.pkey = dest.pkey)
>>
>> I assumed (erroneously) that this would guarantee no duplicate data could make it into the database. The primary key violations are proving me wrong.
>
> Right.  Transaction A and B are interleaved: they both run the same
> check against the same id at the same time.  Both checks pass because
> neither transaction is committed.  This problem is not solvable by
> adjusting the isolation level.

Are you sure that this is the case?  It is my understanding that since 9.1 with SSI (https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SSI) if you set the transaction isolation level to SERIALIZABLE, this problem is solved, as the insert will take a "predicate lock" and the other insert cannot succeed.

We use this to detect / resolve concurrent inserts that violate primary keys and it works great.

However in this case it probably doesn't help the OP because the cost of restarting the entire import is likely too high.

>
> Typical solutions might be to:
> A. Lock the table while inserting
> B. Retry the transaction following an error.
> C. Import the records to a staging table, then copy the do the
> deduplication check when moving from the staging table
>



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: how to tell master from replica
Next
From: Shigeru Hanada
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned table + postgres_FDW not working in 9.3