Hi,
I’ve also seen such cases in the kernel code, and I’m wondering if this should be added to the patch here?
```
postgres@zxm-VMware-Virtual-Platform:~/code/postgres$ git diff
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c
index bcbc226125c..9dadd6da672 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ pg_lock_status(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
values[1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field1);
values[8] = ObjectIdGetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field2);
values[6] = ObjectIdGetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field3);
- values[9] = Int16GetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field4);
+ values[9] = UInt16GetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field4);
nulls[2] = true;
nulls[3] = true;
nulls[4] = true;
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ pg_lock_status(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
values[1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field1);
values[7] = ObjectIdGetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field2);
values[8] = ObjectIdGetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field3);
- values[9] = Int16GetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field4);
+ values[9] = UInt16GetDatum(instance->locktag.locktag_field4);
nulls[2] = true;
nulls[3] = true;
nulls[4] = true;
```
--
Regards,
Man Zeng
www.openhalo.org
