Hi,
I've observed that the functions `pgaio_io_call_complete_shared()` and` pgaio_io_call_complete_local()` contain nearly
identicalcode,
with only minor differences in initialization and callback selection.
This code duplication was previously noted with an XXX comment.
I propose extracting the common logic into a new internal function `pgaio_io_call_complete_internal()`,
which uses a boolean parameter to distinguish between the two code paths.
What do you think of this approach?
--
Regards,
Man Zeng
www.openhalo.org
