Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Devin L. Ganger
Subject Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.
Date
Msg-id slrncoqs7n.616.devin@bofh.thecabal.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.  (Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:11:09 -0800, Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> wrote:

>  Since we have the discussion going, someone mentioned that the group name
>  should be comp.databases.postgresql.  I think this is a good name and I'd
>  like to see what everyone thinks of it.

I think you're pursuing this backwards, Mike. You should contact the current
owner of the present mail-to-news gateway and build some sort of consensus
with *him* on what the problem and proposed solution is, before trying to
create a solution that will only muddy the waters up even farther.

This person made a choice to use Big 8 namespace on his server (and other
servers). His server, his rules. Maybe he can be brought to the table to
discuss why that isn't the easy fix he thought it was and figure out what
the best way to go is from here.

--
Devin L. Ganger <devin@thecabal.org>
"Aikido is based around the central precept of letting an attack take
its natural course.  You, of course, don't want to impede that natural
flow by being in its way." -- overheard on the PyraMOO

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Trying to get postgres to use an index
Next
From: Brent Wood
Date:
Subject: Re: Can this be indexed?