Re: [GENERAL] High Availability - Performace Scalability - - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From JEDIDIAH
Subject Re: [GENERAL] High Availability - Performace Scalability -
Date
Msg-id slrncloadi.8ae.jedi@nomad.mishnet
Whole thread Raw
In response to High Availability - Performace Scalability - Dyanamic Load Balancing  (JM <jerome@gmanmi.tv>)
List pgsql-admin
On 2004-08-18, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
> Jerome,
>
> I'm curious what you expect out of clustering. High Availability, and
> Load Balancing seem possible, but Performance ? I would think there is a
> cost associated with clustering, that degrades performance.

    Data in an RDBMS application should be localised enough that you
should be able to evenly split the workload over a number of cluster
nodes and not have them step on each other's toes too much. It's a difficult
problem but not insurmountable.

[deletia]

--
        Negligence will never equal intent, no matter how you
attempt to distort reality to do so. This is what separates         |||
the real butchers from average Joes (or Fritzes) caught up in      / | \
events not in their control.




pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: stig erikson
Date:
Subject: Re: fedora core 2 postgresql regression tests fail
Next
From: Cris Carampa
Date:
Subject: pg_autovacuum & postmaster shutdown+startup