>>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 06-Feb-01 12:39:24 AM >>>
> "Nic Ferrier" wrote:
>>>> - the postmaster was being started without nohup
Oliver wrote:
>> If postmaster is being started by init, it should not need
>> nohup, because init never exits and postmaster is not
>> going to get shutdown unexpectedly.
I agree... I was just putting into the script what was in the man
page about postmaster.
The man page suggests that nohup is required to init postmaster, I
know this isn't true but to implement an example init file and not
match up with the man page seemed foolish.
I guess nohup would stop postmaster doing something awfull if it
doesn't handle HUP properly but I very much doubt that you guys fail
to handle HUP.
Nic
