Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date
Msg-id rwhdaxlspkwwoya5zrbladp2hjfzfv6jgfxszfpcas5aam4bva@an6ppsumqe66
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2025-12-02 12:02:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:59:52PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2025-12-02 11:46:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> I doubt that we can drop this check yet.  There are still a lot of
> >> places in the tree that need to be switched from off_t to pgoff_t,
> >> like the buffer APIs, etc.
> > 
> > Hm? What are you thinking about re buffer APIs?
> 
> buffile.h and buffile.c still have traces of off_t.

Oh, I was interpreting buffer as bufmgr.c...

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Next
From: Xuneng Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded