pgstat vs aset - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Subject | pgstat vs aset |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | rtskcyc2o6rt7yebeej4byb62fnv7mcbuiodyuduqmi4ek2mnn@y5pqlz5fbsbd Whole thread Raw |
| Responses |
Re: pgstat vs aset
Re: pgstat vs aset Re: pgstat vs aset |
| List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, In [1] I looked at pgstat memory usage after sort of a complaint by Nathan. The conversion of "PgStat Shared Ref" to slab seems like an improvement we obviously should make [2]. In the email I also showed how much CacheMemoryContext using a lot of memory after doing a database wide VACUUM (with ~100k tables), not very surprising. I didn't immediately look at the next few entries: ┌────────────────────────┬─────────────┬───────────────┬────────────┬─────────────┬────────────┐ │ name │ total_bytes │ total_nblocks │ free_bytes │ free_chunks │ used_bytes │ ├────────────────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────┼────────────┼─────────────┼────────────┤ │ CacheMemoryContext │ 168820784 │ 31 │ 2363064 │ 33 │ 166457720 │ │ PgStat Pending │ 27983872 │ 3419 │ 27846912 │ 112699 │ 136960 │ │ smgr relation table │ 16777216 │ 12 │ 2797592 │ 50 │ 13979624 │ │ MdSmgr │ 8388608 │ 11 │ 3475256 │ 1 │ 4913352 │ │ PgStat Shared Ref │ 5767344 │ 88 │ 19712 │ 352 │ 5747632 │ │ PgStat Shared Ref Hash │ 4195376 │ 2 │ 712 │ 0 │ 4194664 │ │ Relcache by OID │ 4194304 │ 10 │ 57448 │ 24 │ 4136856 │ │ TopMemoryContext │ 173264 │ 7 │ 32968 │ 79 │ 140296 │ └────────────────────────┴─────────────┴───────────────┴────────────┴─────────────┴────────────┘ When I did I was quite surprised to see "PgStat Pending" using so much, as it should all be freed after the stats have been submitted, a few seconds later at most. After a moment of worry about having introduced a leak, and adding the necessary columns to see more information, it's clear that all the memory was actually freed. It's just that we don't ever free aset blocks, even if all the constituent memory has been freed. So the overall context size doesn't shrink. That seems decidedly not great. I wonder how bad it would be to teach aset to recognize this situation. But I think for this use case we actually have a more fitting memory context type for this workload, i.e. GenerationContext. With that the size after the same vacuum is │ PgStat Pending │ 134144 │ 3 │ 133848 │ 0 │ 296 │ Seems like a fairly obvious change. My local experimental changes attached. Greetings, Andres Freund [1] https://postgr.es/m/fcvnawwq32mamvf66q5i3sk73xudxz5corqlgqljtocepspjps%40ypvl6yjzy5xk [2] It's a big enough saving that I'm kinda wondering about whether we should try to sneak it into 19.
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: