On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Kevin Grittner
> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>> My set is different, but the principle is the same -- I can't find
>> the time to read all messages to all lists (really, I've tried), so
>> I limit by list to try to target the issues of most interest to me.
>
> But all it means is you get a random subset of the messages. You're
> still missing most of the admin or sql or performance related threads
> since they're mostly on -general anyways. Those three categories cover
> pretty much all of -general.
Maybe we should remove -general. :-)
...Robert
