On 2024-02-18 20:00 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> The overhead of parse_type_and_format can be related to higher planning
> time. PL/pgSQL can assign composite without usage FROM clause.
Thanks, didn't know that this makes a difference. In that case both
variants are on par.
BEGIN;
CREATE FUNCTION format_with_parse_type(text)
RETURNS text
LANGUAGE plpgsql
STABLE STRICT
AS $$
DECLARE
p record := parse_type($1);
BEGIN
RETURN format_type(p.typid, p.typmod);
END
$$;
CREATE FUNCTION format_with_to_regtypmod(text)
RETURNS text
LANGUAGE plpgsql
STABLE STRICT
AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN format_type(to_regtype($1), to_regtypmod($1));
END
$$;
COMMIT;
Results:
SELECT format_with_parse_type('interval second(0)');
pgbench (17devel)
transaction type: format_with_parse_type.sql
scaling factor: 1
query mode: simple
number of clients: 1
number of threads: 1
maximum number of tries: 1
duration: 10 s
number of transactions actually processed: 253530
number of failed transactions: 0 (0.000%)
latency average = 0.039 ms
initial connection time = 1.846 ms
tps = 25357.551681 (without initial connection time)
SELECT format_with_to_regtypmod('interval second(0)');
pgbench (17devel)
transaction type: format_with_to_regtypmod.sql
scaling factor: 1
query mode: simple
number of clients: 1
number of threads: 1
maximum number of tries: 1
duration: 10 s
number of transactions actually processed: 257942
number of failed transactions: 0 (0.000%)
latency average = 0.039 ms
initial connection time = 1.544 ms
tps = 25798.015526 (without initial connection time)
--
Erik