Hi,
On 2025-11-14 09:12:33 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:05:07AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2025-11-14 09:02:12 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2025-11-14 13:56:06 +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots
> > > >
> > > > The slots are just LSN markers, not something to receive from.
> > >
> > > I think this is wrong. Logical slots also preserve resources other than WAL.
> >
> > I also think that the complaint about slots not being something to receive
> > from is simply wrong for logical slots.
>
> Uh, can you clarify since I can't find details on what they preserve.
Slots (physical ones can, logical ones always do), prevent row cleanup on the
primary.
> The reason I liked the new wording is that the slot is only a small part
> of the receiving path. Almost by definition, the slot is specified as
> _part_ of the connection parameter --- it is not the connection
> parameter.
I don't know what that has to do with anything.
> Can you think of better wording that would be clearer than what we had?
I don't see any need to revise the wording of the changed sections.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
