Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Holger Hoffstaette
Subject Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date
Msg-id pan.2005.01.20.16.55.53.484000@wizards.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering  (Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:32:27 +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:

> Le Jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 16:23, Dave Cramer a écrit :
>> Google uses something called the google filesystem, look it up in
>> google. It is a distributed file system.
>
> Yes that's another point I'm working on ... make a cluster of server using
> GFS ... and making PostgreSQL running with it ...

Did you read the GFS whitepaper? It really works differently from other
filesystems with regard to latency and consistency. You'll probably have
better success with Lustre (http://www.clusterfs.com/) or RedHat's Global
File System (http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/gfs/).
If you're looking for a 'cheap, free and easy' solution you can just as
well stop right now. :-)

-h


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???