Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Holger Hoffstaette
Subject Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Date
Msg-id pan.2004.04.13.21.40.22.360000@wizards.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  (Michal Hlavac <hlavki@medium13.sk>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:56:09 +0200, Holger Klawitter wrote:

> Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words,
> both have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)

True.

> In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the
> original post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3.

"Oh please."

- umount /dev/xxx
- tune2fs -O dir_index dev/xxx
- fsck -f -D /dev/hdxx
- mount /dev/xxx

> That's why I switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any
> problems since).

Time marches on. :-)

Holger


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Cohen
Date:
Subject: cursor questions
Next
From: "Alan Treece"
Date:
Subject: plpgsql: cannot connect to SPI manager