Re: Postgres on RAID5 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From PFC
Subject Re: Postgres on RAID5
Date
Msg-id opsnh534mcth1vuj@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres on RAID5  (Arshavir Grigorian <ag@m-cam.com>)
List pgsql-performance
    Look for the possibility that a foreign key check might not be using an
index. This would yield a seq scan for each insertion, which might be your
problem.


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:22:56 -0500, Arshavir Grigorian <ag@m-cam.com>
wrote:

> Many thanks for all the response.
>
> I guess there are a lot of things to change and tweak and I wonder what
> would be a good benchmarking sample dataset (size, contents).
>
> My tables are very large (the smallest is 7+ mil records) and take
> several days to load (if not weeks). It would be nice to have a sample
> dataset that would be large enough to mimic my large datasets, but small
> enough to load in a short priod of time. Any suggestions?
>
>
> Arshavir
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions about 2 databases.
Next
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres on RAID5