Re: [GENERAL] 9.5 "chained equality" behavior - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: [GENERAL] 9.5 "chained equality" behavior
Date
Msg-id ogkmh8$mj4$1@blaine.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] 9.5 "chained equality" behavior  (Joshua Ma <josh@benchling.com>)
List pgsql-general
Joshua Ma schrieb am 30.05.2017 um 22:56:
> We're going to fix usages of this to
> instead do (a = b && a = c) instead of (a = b = c).

That has to be (a = b AND a = c)

The && operator is not valid for booleans



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Ma
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] 9.5 "chained equality" behavior
Next
From: chiru r
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Access Management question