[JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id of6pgu$7kb$1@blaine.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
The current JDBC driver returns no information about the new partitioned tables in the upcoming Postgres 10.
This is caused by the fact that partitioned tables have a new pg_class.relkind value: 'p'

I have attached a simple patch that fixes the obvious problem that partitioned tables are not returned by getTables()
andno column information is returned from getColumns(). 

The patch essentially treats relkind 'r' and 'p' the same because I think the driver should not make a distinction
betweenregular tables and partitioned tables. 

But I think the bigger is: what do do with the partitions themselves?

Technically they are tables, but I think it would make sense to hide them and let frontend tools deal with displaying
partitionsbelonging to a table (this is e.g. how Oracle does it). 

However, psql displays them as regular tables just like with the "old" inheritance partitions, so that would probably
causesome confusion if getTables() did not return those tables. 


Thomas



Attachment

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Erko Hansar
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException from ByteConverter.int8when resolving generated keys
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables