Re: LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index
Date
Msg-id o2k603c8f071004061133qbfeccea6iec13efdbc3c080d7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index  (Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> wrote:
> Is this a bug? I'm using version 8.4.1.

It's not really a bug, but it's definitely not a feature either.

>  Limit  (cost=0.00..43.46 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=1023.213..1023.214
> rows=1 loops=1)
>    ->  Index Scan using transactions_pkey on transactions
>  (cost=0.00..493029.74 rows=11345 width=4) (actual time=1023.212..1023.212
> rows=1 loops=1)
>          Filter: ((accountid = 108) AND (currency = 'SEK'::bpchar))
>  Total runtime: 1023.244 ms
> (4 rows)

The planner's idea here is that rows matching the filter criteria will
be common enough that an index scan over transactions_pkey will find
one fairly quickly, at which point the executor can return that row
and stop.  But it turns out that those rows aren't as common as the
planner thinks, so the search takes a long time.

...Robert

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ireneusz Pluta
Date:
Subject: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Some question