Hi,
On 2025-08-20 02:54:09 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On linux - the primary OS with OOM killer troubles - I'm pretty sure'll lwlock
> > waiters would get killed due to the postmaster death signal we've configured
> > (c.f. PostmasterDeathSignalInit()).
>
> No, that has a handler that just sets a global variable. That was
> done because recovery used to try to read() from the postmaster pipe
> after replaying every record. Also we currently have some places that
> don't want to be summarily killed (off the top of my head, syncrep
> wants to send a special error message, and the logger wants to survive
> longer than everyone else to catch as much output as possible, things
> I've been thinking about in the context of threads).
That makes no sense. We should just _exit(). If postmaster has been killed,
trying to stay up longer just makes everything more fragile. Waiting for the
logger is *exactly* what we should *not* do - what if the logger also crashed?
There's no postmaster around to start it.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
