Paul Hester schrieb am 06.01.2016 um 06:04:
> This limitation, of consuming sequencers used for defaults on columns
> not necessary to resolve conflict, diminishes the viability for using
> Postges UPSERTS for large data warehouses, is all I'm saying (or
> requires surrogate keys being 64 bit). Just caught me by surprise in
> comparison to other RDBMSs offering some form of UPSERTs that would
> not consume a sequencer if its values weren't required to resolve
> conflicts.
Why does this "diminish" the viability of a sequence?
