Re: Parallel heap vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Parallel heap vacuum
Date
Msg-id mtdjdjujnivwjmazea7nlfvk34ftkamd4biqn5hi2fibjzfk7z@n7rqi2vk54rj
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel heap vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-07-22 11:44:29 -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Do you think it makes sense to implement the above idea that we launch
> parallel vacuum workers for heap through the same vacuumparallel.c
> codebase and maintain the consistent interface with parallel index
> vacuuming APIs?

Yes, that might make sense. But wiring it up via tableam doesn't make sense.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom pgstat support performance regression for simple queries
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error with DEFAULT VALUE in temp table