Re: subversion vs cvs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Subject Re: subversion vs cvs
Date
Msg-id mjqzna698gt.fsf@cs.berkeley.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: subversion vs cvs  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
   Marc> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:   >> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody
considered  >> using subversion instead of CVS ?
 
   Marc> Why?  not that I'm for a chance from something that isn't   Marc> broken, but what advantages does subversion
giveus over   Marc> what we already have?
 

I've had plenty of pain with cvs in terms of directories not being
first-class etc .. but I don't really contribute to pgsql so you guys
probably don't have the same experience. 

I was just curious as it looks like eventually subversion (or arch :-)
will be an alternative to cvs. 

-- 
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: bug in 7.4 SET WITHOUT OIDs
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: linked list rewrite