Re: Reverse Key Index - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: Reverse Key Index
Date
Msg-id mcn11a$lf8$1@ger.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reverse Key Index  ("Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@tbz-pariv.de>)
Responses Re: Reverse Key Index  ("Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@tbz-pariv.de>)
List pgsql-performance
Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 12:04:
> I just thought about btree indexes here mainly because they well-known and well-used in ORM frameworks.

If your ORM framework needs to know about the internals of an index definition or even requires a certain index type,
thenyou should ditch that ORM framework. 

Apart from indexes supporting business constraints (e.g. a unique index) neither the application nor the the ORM
frameworkshould care about indexes at all. 

> does PostgreSQL support the concept of reverse key indexing as described here?

The real question is: why do you think you need such an index?
Do you have any performance problems with the existing BTree index? If yes, which problem exactly?

Thomas



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Sven R. Kunze"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reverse Key Index
Next
From: "Sven R. Kunze"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reverse Key Index