Clinging to sanity, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) mumbled into her beard:
> ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com> writes:
>> My concern though ... wouldn't pgSql server collapse when faced with
>> transaction spawning across 100M+ records?
>
> No. You're extrapolating from Oracle-specific assumptions again.
Or from MySQL-specific assumptions :-).
It seems reasonable (absent of particular knowledge to the contrary)
that the size of a transaction might be _expected_ to be some sort of
constraint; it is quite surprising that it isn't, and I don't think
that's purely based on the mistake of assuming that the whole world
does things exactly like Oracle.
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/postgresql.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #89. "After I captures the hero's
superweapon, I will not immediately disband my legions and relax my
guard because I believe whoever holds the weapon is unstoppable. After
all, the hero held the weapon and I took it from him."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
