Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
Date
Msg-id m3psnhq1rw.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Online backup vs Continuous backup  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
>> Backup".
>
> This doesn't seem like an improvement.  "Online backup" is the standard
> terminology AFAIK.

There's something ambiguous about it, in view that there are two
useful points in time for a backup to be "as of," namely:
 a) The start time (which is what pg_dump does), and
 b) The end time (which I believe is not uncommon with other systems).

PITR is obviously more like b)...
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','gmail.com').
http://linuxfinances.info/info/slony.html
Keeping instructions  and operands  in  different memories  saves  .20
(.09) microseconds.

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "Aftab Alam"
Date:
Subject: sending mail from Postgres
Next
From: Volkan YAZICI
Date:
Subject: PHP, PostgreSQL Extension