Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date
Msg-id m3oebykwmh.fsf@knuth.cbbrowne.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Feature freeze date for 8.1  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
In the last exciting episode, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
>     o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)

If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate
time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature.

What I'd _really_ love to see (and alas, it's beyond my ken) is some
parallel to the FSM, namely a "Recently Updated Blocks Map," which
would enable a vacuuming approach that would not go through entire
tables, but which would rather go through only those blocks known to
be recently updated.

There continues to be trouble if you have a table that grows to 50
million rows where there are 100K rows that are being heavily
updated.  In effect, only the 100K rows need facuuming.
-- 
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxfinances.info/info/emacs.html
Group Dynamics
"Following Minsky and Schelling, consider a person as a society of
agents. A group is then a larger society of such agents. Understand
groups by examining interactions of coalitions of agents that
cross-cut their grouping into people."
-- Mark Miller


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop?
Next
From: a3a18850@telus.net
Date:
Subject: Re: Distinct-Sampling (Gibbons paper) for Postgres