Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Cloos
Subject Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date
Msg-id m3ocaiuphq.fsf@jhcloos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "JD" == Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:

JD> 2. Fix the input/output functions in a special mode for dump/reload,
JD>    to make them true inverses.

That can be done by supporting the %A printf(3)/scanf(3) format.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: add label to enum syntax