Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Date
Msg-id m31xoy1hkt.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-general
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when DCorbit@connx.com ("Dann Corbit") would write:
> Available memory is huge (e.g. you buy a machine with 24 gigs of ram)

Actually, as soon as 2GB of memory starts to feel "restrictive," 64
bit addressing starts being at least nominally worthwhile.

The only way you get Intel 32 bit systems to recognize much more than
that is to get into a mode called "PAE," which (theoretically) offers
the ability to address as much as 64GB.

Unfortunately, it's quite a hack, having considerable likelihood of
slowing your system and possibly not working at all.  The slowdown to
be expected is in management of DMA devices (like disk drives).

On the "not working at all" side of things, I can't see that there's
ANY FreeBSD RAID controller that is compatible with PAE, aside from a
Compaq one where the driver author has lately released a warning of
performance problems.

That nicely characterizes the issue that you have to be _real_ careful
about what hardware you buy when going past about 2GB of memory.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "acm.org")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/spiritual.html
"If your  parents never had  children, chances are you  won't either."
-- Dick Cavett

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium