Re: missing schema qualifications in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: missing schema qualifications in psql
Date
Msg-id m2x603c8f071004010819pb96c4274rcfb8ac126d04defd@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing schema qualifications in psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> While psql is careful to schema-qualify all references to built-in
>> objects (pg_catalog.*), it completely neglects to do this for built-in
>> operators,
>
> That's intentional because of the utter lack of readability that
> results if you try to use OPERATOR() everywhere ...

I was mulling over in my head the possibility that the date on which
this patch was posted was deliberate...

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques.
Next
From: tv@fuzzy.cz
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 9.1 - Release Theme