On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com> wrote:
> This isn't exactly a bug, but it could be considered unintuitive
> behavior. Consider this:
by unintuitive you mean: 'explicitly defined in the SQL standard' :-).I happen to agree with you but that's irrelevant.
If you absolutely
require this use the composite type workaround.
merlin