Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Date
Msg-id m2suuaorc5lavczouk3nrt4t6y5mzrprr67ah4fr65gihv6eol@mmi4u6bg2hch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-11-03 16:06:58 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Nov-03, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to give this subject another chance for pg19.  I'm going to
> > push this if no objections.
> 
> Sure.  I don't understand why patches 0002 and 0003 are separate though.

FWIW, I appreciate such splits. Even if the functionality isn't usable
independently, it's still different type of code that's affected. And the
patches are each big enough to make that worthwhile for easier review.

One thing that'd be nice to do once we have WAIT FOR is to make the common
case of wait_for_catchup() use this facility, instead of polling...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bryan Green
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Fix orphaned backend processes on Windows using Job Objects
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences